From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 11 07:02:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C49E16A4CE for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:02:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ECF8643D54 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:02:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@chello.cz) Received: (qmail 61399 invoked by uid 0); 11 Aug 2004 07:02:04 -0000 Received: from r3al61.chello.upc.cz (HELO isis.wad.cz) (213.220.229.61) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 11 Aug 2004 07:02:03 -0000 Received: by isis.wad.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B5C002FDA01; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 09:02:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 09:02:03 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Glenn Sieb Message-ID: <20040811070203.GA678@isis.wad.cz> References: <1091989450.570.2.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> <20040808202351.GV87690@submonkey.net> <41168DF7.2090601@wingfoot.org> <4116906E.8060408@elvandar.org> <4116ED12.3000809@wingfoot.org> <20040810181651.GA4929@isis.wad.cz> <411916DB.3060307@wingfoot.org> <20040810192520.GB4929@isis.wad.cz> <4119A4DA.1050700@wingfoot.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4119A4DA.1050700@wingfoot.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questionable statement in article X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:02:06 -0000 # ges+lists@wingfoot.org / 2004-08-11 00:47:22 -0400: > Roman Neuhauser said the following on 8/10/2004 3:25 PM: > > > I see you mix "in BSD" with "for BSD" as you see fit for your > > argument. Yes, Apache *is* developed *in BSD*, besides other > > operating systems (and *for* BSD, besides other operating systems). > > Not intentionally, Roman. Don't see attacks where there are none. Please accepty my apology. > So let's put the knives down and discuss things that maybe we can do to > help encourage vendors to make their software available for BSD. No amount of armchair discussion will move a vendor to increase their development and maintenance costs by supporting more operating systems. You need to vote with your money, and make sure the vendor knows they lost a deal because of lack of support for your operating system of choice. That's about all I can contribute to this topic. -- FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE 8:50AM up 53 mins, 1 user, load averages: 0.02, 0.03, 0.00