From owner-freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul  2 19:12:09 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4417537B401
	for <freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 Jul 2003 19:12:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dommail.onthenet.com.au (dommail.OntheNet.com.au
	[203.13.70.57])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2C843FAF
	for <freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 Jul 2003 19:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from grehan@freebsd.org)
Received: from freebsd.org (CPE-203-45-244-178.qld.bigpond.net.au
	[203.45.244.178])
	by dommail.onthenet.com.au (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.4-GA)
	with ESMTP id AAV28652 (AUTH peterg@ptree32.com.au);
	Thu, 3 Jul 2003 12:11:58 +1000 (EST)
Sender: grehan@dommail.onthenet.com.au
Message-ID: <3F039133.A4190609@freebsd.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 12:13:07 +1000
From: Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-12 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sean_Welch@alum.wofford.org
References: <1382382.1057181738346.JavaMail.nobody@ernie.psp.pas.earthlink.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Attempting to cross-compile newest -CURRENT
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC <freebsd-ppc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ppc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ppc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ppc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ppc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ppc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ppc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 02:12:09 -0000

Hi Sean,

> By the way, I added -DNO_WERROR to the list on O'Brien's
> suggestion.

 As I mentioned, that shouldn't be necessary, and might only hide
some errors.

> I removed the -DNOFORTH option; should I also
> remove the -DNO_FORTH option?  If not, what is the difference?

 The loader won't work due to a memory alloc error - still to be debugged.
The -DNO_FORTH was a type - it should have been -DNOFORTH.

> I did run into another rather strange problem yesterday
> and I'm not sure what to do about it.  I'm going to have
> to post a message to the current mailing list about it
> I think.
 ...
> Any suggestions before I mail the current list?

 Get a backtrace from the debugger (db> t) and post that with
the bug report.

 You might want to disable background fsck in the meantime
in your /etc/rc.conf

later,

Peter.