From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Aug 22 05:14:56 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA04994
          for ports-outgoing; Fri, 22 Aug 1997 05:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (ghpc8.ihf.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.90.8])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA04986;
          Fri, 22 Aug 1997 05:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de [134.130.90.6])
	by ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (8.8.5/8.8.6) with ESMTP id OAA21130;
	Fri, 22 Aug 1997 14:14:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from thomas@localhost)
	by ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (8.8.7/8.8.5) id OAA27227;
	Fri, 22 Aug 1997 14:14:43 +0200 (CEST)
To: ports@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org
Subject: tkman and tk-8.0
From: Thomas Gellekum <tg@ihf.rwth-aachen.de>
Date: 22 Aug 1997 14:14:35 +0200
Message-ID: <87n2mact3o.fsf@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de>
Lines: 14
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.37/XEmacs 19.15
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Moin,

tkman-2.0 will require a patch to Tk-8.0 and won't run with older
versions. The patch is available as invisible.patch in the latest beta
(ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/ucb/people/phelps/tcltk/tkman-2.0b6.tar.Z)
and probably won't get included into Tk-8.0. Can we just include it in
the tk80 port? The resulting wish is compatible to the original, just
the text widget contains an additional command (`-invisible') which
tkman-2.0 depends upon. Another possibility would be a separate port
for this, which seems silly to me.

Thoughts?

tg