From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep  3 04:08:15 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA8C41065674
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed,  3 Sep 2008 04:08:15 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jfesler@gigo.com)
Received: from goat.gigo.com (ipv6.gigo.com [IPv6:2001:470:1:18::2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4A48FC15
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed,  3 Sep 2008 04:08:15 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jfesler@gigo.com)
Received: from goat.gigo.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1:18::114])
	by goat.gigo.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CAED114C6
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue,  2 Sep 2008 21:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 21:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jason Fesler <jfesler@gigo.com>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.1.10.0809022105460.45315@goat.gigo.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (BSF 962 2008-03-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: IPV6_V6ONLY and UDP
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 04:08:15 -0000

I see in the release notes for 7.0; and seperately CURRENT on alpha;
that IPV6_V6ONLY is now fully supported for UDP.

Can someone point me to code/text that explains what exactly was broken 
about it? In what case(s) udp sockets set with IPV6_V6ONLY accepted V4 
packets?

Thanks in advance..

-- 
  Jason Fesler, email/jabber <jfesler@gigo.com> resume: http://jfesler.com
  "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day;
  set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."