Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 16:42:30 -0500 (EST) From: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@FreeBSD.org> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: Alexey Zelkin <alexey.zelkin@ionidea.com>, audit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: CFR: strncpy -> strlcpy in setlocale() Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020124164054.61343C-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20020124213730.GA87013@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: :On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 21:58:35 +0200, Alexey Zelkin wrote: :> hi, :> :> Any objections against this patch ? It's based on :> rev 1.23 of NetBSD's setlocale.c. : :Ok. I know strlcpy() makes more sense than strncpy(), but is there any difference in terms of speed? This being said, if strlcpy() is slower and the strncpy() usage is correct, is there really a need for a change? I guess readability and possible future mistakes in usage are a bonus for strlcpy. Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew R. Reiter arr@watson.org arr@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020124164054.61343C-100000>