From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 3 16:43:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBDE106564A for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:43:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de) Received: from www.sonnenberger.org (www.sonnenberger.org [92.79.50.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0866D8FC26 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:43:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from britannica.bec.de (www.sonnenberger.org [192.168.1.10]) by www.sonnenberger.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E597D6678A for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:43:28 +0100 (CET) Received: by britannica.bec.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 36EFF15C70; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:43:11 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:43:11 +0100 From: Joerg Sonnenberger To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100303164311.GA20695@britannica.bec.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <20100219163644.da89e882.ray__27111.9062825621$1266591431$gmane$org@dlink.ua> <20100219222604.44e50248.ray@ddteam.net> <20100220201510.720c62fd.ray@ddteam.net> <4B8E8E5A.5050203@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B8E8E5A.5050203@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: GEOM_ULZMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:43:46 -0000 On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 08:29:14AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Adrian Chadd wrote: > >On 21 February 2010 02:20, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >>Oh I know that! I'm just saying that I may try lzma'ing the kernel and > >>rootfs's to see what kind of savings I get over gzip. :) > > > >The answer is "whoa". 24 megabyte compressed kernel + MDROOT drops to > >6.5 megabytes with gzip -9 and a few bytes shy of 5 megabytes with a > >default lzma compress. > > Interesting question: What is the impact on boot speed? > It could be a lot faster to load 5MB from disk and > decompress to a 24MB image than to wait for 24MB from > disk. I don't think it helps in terms of boot speed, at least as long as the kernel image can be read without constant seeking. Joerg