Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Apr 1995 19:28:49 -0700
From:      David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
To:        Bernard.Steiner@germany.eu.net
Cc:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: couple of bugs in 2.0R 
Message-ID:  <199504180228.TAA00214@corbin.Root.COM>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 17 Apr 95 19:18:50 %2B0200." <199504171719.TAA03159@qwerty.Germany.EU.net> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Sorry if one or both of these have been mentioned before...
>
>The watchdog timer in i386/isa/if_ed.c gets set to 2, which appears not to be
>enough (on my system, that is). I increased the value to 20 (as an ad-hoc
>solution), and now I don't get any more of those
>stray irq 11
>ed0 timeout
>messages. Unless solved, can we get a flag for ed that sort of increases the
>watchdog timer significantly ?

   Umm, that would increase the timeout to 20 seconds. This is not desireable
and should never be necessary. I don't see how increasing it above what it
currently is could affect the problem at all (the interrupt should occur in
less than 100ms no matter what happens).

-DG



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504180228.TAA00214>