Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 07:18:38 -0600 From: Jacques Vidrine <nectar@freebsd.org> To: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/security security.sgml Message-ID: <3FB627AE.1000902@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20031115114647.F53578@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <200311141640.hAEGefco043647@repoman.freebsd.org> <20031115114647.F53578@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dmitry Morozovsky said the following on 11/15/03 2:49 AM: > Dear Jacques, > > On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Jacques Vidrine wrote: > > JV> New branch RELENG_4_9: EoL one year from release. > JV> RELENG_4: EoL at same time as RELENG_4_9. > > thinking that RELENG_5 would not be created before RELENG_5_3 or around, which > is at least 6 months in future, wasn't pushing RELENG_4 to EoL a bit too > preliminary? > > I suppose provoding at least 9-12 months for seamless major version transition > required... > If you looked at the actual commit, you would see that I just extended RELENG_4's already existing EoL by 10 months. At this stage, it is still just a guess, so I just use the same EoL date as the most recent security branch. I expect it will be extended again, depending on what happens during the next year. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine NTT/Verio SME FreeBSD UNIX Heimdal nectar@celabo.org jvidrine@verio.net nectar@freebsd.org nectar@kth.se
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FB627AE.1000902>