From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Feb 28 11:40:55 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA05923
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 11:40:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from brasil.moneng.mei.com (brasil.moneng.mei.com [151.186.109.160])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA05910
          Wed, 28 Feb 1996 11:40:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by brasil.moneng.mei.com (8.7.Beta.1/8.7.Beta.1) id NAA03192; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 13:39:56 -0600
From: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Message-Id: <199602281939.NAA03192@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Subject: Re: -stable hangs at boot (fwd)
To: fenner@parc.xerox.com (Bill Fenner)
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 13:39:55 -0600 (CST)
Cc: jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com, phk@critter.tfs.com, stable@freebsd.org,
        current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <96Feb28.111437pst.177480@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> from "Bill Fenner" at Feb 28, 96 11:14:21 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> In message <199602262117.PAA15987@brasil.moneng.mei.com>you write:
> >Yes, I can imagine  :-)  I just want my firewalls to do something mildly
> >more social - like return a HOST_UNREACHABLE
> 
> How about "Communication Administratively Prohibited" (code 13, see RFC1812 
> section 5.3.9)
> 
>   Bill

The hell if I care  :-)

My only concern would be making sure the right thing happened.

... JG