From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 26 00:11:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CEFA16A4CE; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:11:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032FF43D2F; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:11:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id ED7555310; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:11:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id AA8ED530D; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:11:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 8E4B133C71; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:11:06 +0100 (CET) To: Helge Oldach References: <200402260743.IAA18903@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:11:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200402260743.IAA18903@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com> (Helge Oldach's message of "Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:43:24 +0100 (MET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.63 cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" cc: security-team@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: [is this mbuf problem real?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:11:16 -0000 Helge Oldach writes: > maybe someone can comment on the status of this alert? There have been > some comments about fixing it on freebsd-net@ but I haven't seen a CVS > log - or I just missed it. It's been fixed, look for log messages about using uma for reassembly queues. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no