From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 16:18:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25CE0643 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:18:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nonesuch@longcount.org) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B403E8FC12 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:18:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id fo14so4979642vcb.13 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:18:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=k7lqM8hmncN5L1QvdL1+tgEtMGShMjhbmTDz+NbO/8g=; b=hpm/pMwg0BSf8fsOs1FCYW4cdYpuw7rXg1eMA3sFuHDDeDlwDnpmc7cY5Azq6XLnvA N7Yk1Jf5IZ1yBThcdpjqnIZARDwgBYvzEBNF/vF0gWE3Z7EWyJ2Dc1vFiOjyst8Mn76d 4AjkNS9AMQVirGXvWvN6y08WPqZfjgFk0rO/Fc11edmNbXSGdo/cILD7qo4jhHVGNWjT +r+mkmoZzAxQaGeaGKCcohylApQJXMOWezm2QM+rtA3Pt7a7j+GGzRTAEvYuu+1G5U/M Eprgzi4WoccO01L2/Tajm8GtFSalSKhGXt/mtjTAuV+R5RftCqKDEx8ghJbDixtzSrTg lQ/g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.92.144 with SMTP id cm16mr9997541vdb.36.1355242724880; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:18:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.210.34 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:18:44 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [209.66.78.50] In-Reply-To: <20121211140043.GB20011@in-addr.com> References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> <201212102352.QAA09737@lariat.net> <20121211140043.GB20011@in-addr.com> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:18:44 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? From: Mark Saad To: Gary Palmer X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkmZpnAIgwrotU2mps00CVe4BkuwWmnCT3Uua4uZxS6rV+E74A3o3ZBpSdwCb9ZzzLc1GyY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Brett Glass , Adrian Chadd , stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:18:46 -0000 So what is the short summary ? From what I can see, the wiki is out of date again. the ISO are on the master server, and working out to the mirrors. FreeBSD update is still not updated. Does someone just need to just update the wiki with the relevant info ? On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Gary Palmer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 08:06:24PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Brett Glass wrote: > > > At 04:29 PM 12/10/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > > > >> There's politics in every organisation. There are ego clashes in every > > >> organisation. Sometimes you'll fit in, sometimes you won't. If you > > >> feel there are issues, find people inside the community who you do get > > >> along well with and talk with them about it. > > >> > > >> It sucks, yes. I'm one of those "shut up and code already" types and I > > >> deal badly with politics. > > > > > > > > > Me, too. That's why I have been contributing code quietly through > others > > > rather than putting myself out in the front lines. > > > > > > In any event -- back to the original topic -- there should indeed be > better > > > communications between the Release Engineering team and the community. > > > The time it takes to post updates -- especially as it gets close to > release > > > time -- would be recovered many times over because folks like me > wouldn't > > > have any need to e-mail regarding status and projected schedules. ;-) > > > > I whole-heatedly agree... but I know a little about release > > engineering for a large project, especially when the release team is > > unpaid and has to honor commitments to $real_job. Release engineering > > is very detail-oriented and unforgiving. This is not really > > compatible with part-time work. > > > > The RE must be focused, first ans foremost, on getting a release out > > the door as quickly as possible and not to have any serious problems > > with that release. This makes it very had to pull bakc and make > > announcements or even update posted schedules. That is made even worse > > by hte desire to make such communication accurate or at least useful. > > Since there is a LOT of guessing involved in pulling together a > > release (how long will "Joe" take to fix this problem or why are there > > half a dozen reports of a serious issue with the RC, when no one else > > can reproduce it or even figure out what part of the system is causing > > it), RE folks are usually reticent about trying to give out any > > information since it will most likely be inaccurate. > > > > This is why I accept the line that it will be released when it is > > ready. I really think it's about ready, but not even the head of the > > 9.1 RE team KNOWS when it will be ready, even if the ISO builds are > > started. "There is many a slip twixt the cup and the lip." > > I don't remember seeing any updates in e-mail, but the > > http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html > > url has been updated. Its a litle out of date now (last update about 2 > weeks ago), but it does include information on the release of 9.1 and what > is holding it up (specifically getting a minimal set of packages built). > With the 2 branches tagged (ports and src) it is likely still a matter > of getting stuff built in a known clean environment. > > Gary > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- mark saad | nonesuch@longcount.org