Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 18:58:48 +0100 From: "Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg" <listsub@rambo.simx.org> To: Ceri <setantae@submonkey.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mount_mfs with softupdate generates panic Message-ID: <3C110358.9020505@rambo.simx.org> References: <3C10F786.1070703@rambo.simx.org> <20011207174605.GA9762@rhadamanth>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ceri wrote: >On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 06:08:22PM +0100, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg wrote: > >>Has anyone used memory disks, with softupdates enabled, succesfully? >> > >There isn't any point. > What do you mean no point? I agree, the performance gained of using Soft Updates on a memory disk is probably small, but as I mentioned, this was done purely for performance, hence the noatime and async flags. Im by no means a filesystem expert, but Soft Updates should improve performance on memory disks as well as regular harddrives, right? > >This does sound like a bug though. >I'll test it myself at some point when I can afford a kernel panic. > Please let me know what happens, Im very curious to see if this is a bug or just my machines. -- R To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C110358.9020505>