From owner-freebsd-security Fri Jan 19 11:59:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from gratis.grondar.za (grouter.grondar.za [196.7.18.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C774B37B400; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:59:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from grondar.za (root@gratis.grondar.za [196.7.18.133]) by gratis.grondar.za (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0JJwoI47779; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 21:58:55 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <200101191958.f0JJwoI47779@gratis.grondar.za> To: dhagan@colltech.com Cc: Kris Kennaway , Fernando Schapachnik , "David J. MacKenzie" , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: full PAM support for login, rshd, and su References: <3A686C13.3F5BD5ED@colltech.com> In-Reply-To: <3A686C13.3F5BD5ED@colltech.com> ; from dhagan@colltech.com "Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:32:19 EST." Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 21:58:55 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Well, the plan to replace it has been discussed, but it's not going to > > go ahead until at the very least the netbsd version is taught all of > > the missing options and features which it doesn't have, relative to > > our current ftpd. But it's still something for people to keep in mind > > here. > > So should Fernando and I try to get patches committed to the current > ftpd or not? David O'Brien gave the impression that we shouldn't bother > since it was going to be replaced RSN. Hold off. lets see what happens... M -- Mark Murray Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message