From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Fri Jan 26 10:04:02 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7EBECD720; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 10:04:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9829C6C44D; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 10:04:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F5B3F6FA; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 04:54:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from anthias (vie-188-118-240-174.dsl.sil.at [188.118.240.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0A063F6C9; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 04:54:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 10:53:59 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Mathieu Arnold cc: Alex Dupre , Alexey Dokuchaev , svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r459751 - in head/lang: . solidity solidity/files In-Reply-To: <20180123144743.scc42sitwjhvxspv@aragorn.in.absolight.net> Message-ID: References: <201801231358.w0NDwMa8074241@repo.freebsd.org> <20180123140938.GA73049@FreeBSD.org> <57ffd7bd-6a3f-b315-b582-17d9dccee5a8@FreeBSD.org> <20180123144743.scc42sitwjhvxspv@aragorn.in.absolight.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 10:04:02 -0000 On Tue, 23 Jan 2018, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > portlint is a third party static lint tool, it does not understand what > you does, it just tells you when it is very very bad (when it does not > get it wrong.) This feels like a (way) too negative assessment of portlint. It does catch a large number of issues, is maintained very actively, and by one of us, not a third party. Without portlint the Ports Collection would be significantly worse off, and if anything it would be good to see it used more widely. Gerald