From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul 10 09:58:09 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65A631065674
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:58:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jdc@parodius.com)
Received: from mx01.sc1.parodius.com (mx01.sc1.parodius.com [72.20.106.3])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544D78FC19
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:58:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jdc@parodius.com)
Received: by mx01.sc1.parodius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 471371CC093; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:58:09 -0700
From: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org>
To: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>
Message-ID: <20080710095809.GA59288@eos.sc1.parodius.com>
References: <20080710094006.GX6902@e-Gitt.NET>
	<20080710094451.GS62764@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080710094451.GS62764@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: BIND update?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:58:09 -0000

On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 07:44:51PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2008-Jul-10 11:40:06 +0200, Oliver Brandmueller <ob@e-Gitt.NET> wrote:
> >shouldn't there be a very urgent BIND update somewhere around?
> 
> There has been a very long thread about this in -security.  Leaving
> out the trolls and flaming, the salient points are:
> - The bind port has been updated to include the relevant patches
> - The security team is aware of the issue and is working on a fix.

I'm curious to know why the BIND ports were updated before the base
system BIND.  Absolutely no offence intended towards Doug, but the
priority seems reversed.

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwick                                jdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking                       http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator                  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.              PGP: 4BD6C0CB |