From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 13 07:51:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08731106564A for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 07:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alanbclements@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20548FC0A for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 07:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyf2 with SMTP id 2so256789gyf.13 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:51:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jYlYjgya1jAFGp++krFypI93JYqih8h9r35z97wHpjs=; b=sW0aSzOKtzHK5xJbUhZRD4+5VuysDyT04ZXGMkPYdrJVqWXTy3IBHivTfxiAtq/+R9 2UZwn80OxI0XqTYtqQ5ywLV8rC1f94Y/oBU3WyQO8ub/m/LTPlhB8j+7SlwTnu/U4049 zdw8rH/eNeh/NrXUHlkxYXpQLdHfm8Ictnvio= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.2.194 with SMTP id 2mr8741373ibk.38.1315898573334; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:22:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.199.201 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:22:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 01:22:53 -0600 Message-ID: From: Alan Clements To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: copyrights X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 07:51:50 -0000 On the front page of the FreeBSD Handbook the copyright notice reads: "Copyright=A0=A9 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 The FreeBSD Documentation Project" This seems excessively long. Is there a reason why it just doesn't simply r= ead: "Copyright=A0=A9 1995-2011 The FreeBSD Documentation Project" This seems more readable. The former is running off the end of the page and is starting to look cluttered. Unless there is some legal reason I'm not aware of listing each year in order seems unnecessary. Sincerely, Alan B. Clements Saskatoon, SK