From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Sep 23 05:00:50 1995
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id FAA01346
          for ports-outgoing; Sat, 23 Sep 1995 05:00:50 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA01336
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 23 Sep 1995 05:00:47 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.9) id FAA03541; Sat, 23 Sep 1995 05:00:27 -0700
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 1995 05:00:27 -0700
Message-Id: <199509231200.FAA03541@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
CC: ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199509231130.NAA21397@uriah.heep.sax.de> (message from J Wunsch on Sat, 23 Sep 1995 13:30:46 +0200 (MET DST))
Subject: Re: EXEC_DEPENDS
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 * > games/xpacman/Makefile:EXEC_DEPENDS=    unzip:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unzip
 * 
 * This is clearly a BUILD_DEPENDS candidate.

Yeah, it is.  I just wanted the MAINTAINERs to jump in and modify the
Makefiles themselves. :)

(Also, some of them I'm not very sure which one I should use...that's
 why I want you guys to fix them, as I will need to start a
 compilation and stare at the screen.)

 * Thank you!
   ^^^^^^^^^

Or does this mean you want me to fix it? ;)

Satoshi