From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org  Sat Apr 21 17:00:39 2018
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B55FFB2C06
 for <freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 21 Apr 2018 17:00:39 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org)
Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org",
 Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F04F07BA25;
 Sat, 21 Apr 2018 17:00:38 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org)
Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (220-253-154-11.dyn.iinet.net.au
 [220.253.154.11]) (authenticated bits=0)
 by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w3LH0QVi049273
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
 Sat, 21 Apr 2018 10:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
 (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org)
Subject: Re: RFC: Hiding per-CPU kernel output behind bootverbose
To: Stefan Blachmann <sblachmann@gmail.com>, gljennjohn@gmail.com
Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>,
 Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap.com>, Konstantin Belousov
 <kib@freebsd.org>, Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org>
References: <01000162df15f856-1e5d2641-2a72-4250-8d8e-adcd47bc5db4-000000@email.amazonses.com>
 <20180419204405.GE6887@kib.kiev.ua>
 <CAG6CVpUerOo+55nJq61Hy83RYpbOZS6puEDuemspfNS12urZZw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180419214550.GF6887@kib.kiev.ua>
 <01000162e58a466e-98f0305b-1723-467a-bc49-342c3fa9fc5b-000000@email.amazonses.com>
 <20180421092049.GM6887@kib.kiev.ua> <20180421123544.56d7e690@ernst.home>
 <CACc-My0WjSG2-B4Cu1h+W5aGir5AqJnGde1_-fKWGR+6=KrhUg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <d3bcc263-6760-b0ba-e681-7941fee95ecd@freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 01:00:21 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACc-My0WjSG2-B4Cu1h+W5aGir5AqJnGde1_-fKWGR+6=KrhUg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 17:00:39 -0000

On 21/4/18 9:03 pm, Stefan Blachmann wrote:
> For example, it is just amazing to see how all reports about massive
> flaws in kernel microcode detection/updating and all offered patches
> are being blatantly ignored for many years. See for example:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192487
yes I saw that but Only a handful of people know what's going on there 
so 99% of the
developers just stood back and said "I hope someone who understands 
this picks it up".
I didn't follow the one response I saw. So I couldn't decide on who 
had the better argument.