From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 20 17:07:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F068106566B for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:07:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tjado.ml.freebsd-xen@maecke.net) Received: from mail.xuat.net (maecke.net [85.25.179.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED748FC12 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:07:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.10.33] (g230241247.adsl.alicedsl.de [92.230.241.247]) by mail.xuat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9262A75DB; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:34:50 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C1E4AE5.8060300@maecke.net> Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 19:07:49 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VGphZG8gTcOkY2tl?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guillaume Seigneuret References: <010101cb0fb1$e015e370$a041aa50$@fr> <4C1E2575.2070405@maecke.net> <000301cb1090$df239fe0$9d6adfa0$@fr> <4C1E3A51.8080905@maecke.net> <000401cb1091$c5ae06d0$510a1470$@fr> In-Reply-To: <000401cb1091$c5ae06d0$510a1470$@fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Paravirtualized FreeBSD 8 Guest on Citrix XenServer 5.5/5.6 Host X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:07:44 -0000 I didn't do any tests in general. I used for a while FreeBSD HVM (and other os guests...) under xen-3.2.1. There I got problems that VM's react very slowly under ZFS/UFS I/O stress (tar of logs, etc...) till I need to reboot the guest. It was under FreeBSD 7.2 with ZFS beta but 8.0 didn't worked with that xen/kernel. The last weeks I tried Xen 4.0.0 but tap:aio and tap:tapdisk:aio cause complete host kernel crashes under I/O stress (dd if /dev/zero...). With Xen-4.0.1-rc3-pre I haven't these problems, FreeBSD 8 is working (so booting works ;) and states/times seems a lot more healthier. Softs: Webserver with a top 5000 (alexa) site (high db access - cached, some I/O because of downloads), high threaded game server (for wc3), mail server and other webservers/stuff... Am 20.06.2010 18:00, schrieb Guillaume Seigneuret: > Could you tell us what did you do to test the stability ? > Softs running on it, who many time and with who many users using it ? > > Thanks by advance. > > Cordialement, > > Guillaume Seigneuret > > > > Network and System Security Architect > Web : http://www.omegacube.fr > Address : > Hôtel Technologique - BP 100 > Technopôle de Château Gombert > 13382 Marseille Cedex 13 > > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Tjado Mäcke [mailto:tjado.ml.freebsd-xen@maecke.net] > Envoyé : dimanche 20 juin 2010 17:57 > À : Guillaume Seigneuret > Cc : 'Pandu Poluan'; freebsd-xen@freebsd.org > Objet : Re: Paravirtualized FreeBSD 8 Guest on Citrix XenServer 5.5/5.6 Host > > I mean stable in a general way not for FreeBSD (didn't tried out it in > PV yet). > > tjado > > Am 20.06.2010 17:54, schrieb Guillaume Seigneuret: > >> I did try with Xen 4.0.0. >> But more stable doesn't meens "suitable for production use" ... >> I think the FreeBSD team has to work on its kernel to make it stable under paravirtualized environment. >> It's not really a question of Xen kernel version. >> >> Cordialement, >> >> Guillaume Seigneuret >> >> >> >> Network and System Security Architect >> Web : http://www.omegacube.fr >> Address : >> Hôtel Technologique - BP 100 >> Technopôle de Château Gombert >> 13382 Marseille Cedex 13 >> >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : Tjado Mäcke [mailto:tjado.ml.freebsd-xen@maecke.net] >> Envoyé : dimanche 20 juin 2010 16:28 >> À : Guillaume Seigneuret >> Cc : Pandu Poluan; freebsd-xen@freebsd.org >> Objet : Re: Paravirtualized FreeBSD 8 Guest on Citrix XenServer 5.5/5.6 Host >> >> Hi, >> >> which version did you use of 4.0? For me, 4.0.1-rc3-pre runs more stable >> than 4.0.0. >> Do you have some more information about the FreeBSD pv? Maybe i will try >> this howto: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=10268 >> >> tjado >> >> Am 20.06.2010 12:00, schrieb Guillaume Seigneuret: >> >> >>> You're welcome, yes I guess it's safer to keep them in standalone servers >>> for the moment. >>> For information I did try : >>> >>> FreeBSD 8 i386 paravirtualized on : >>> >>> - Xen 3.4.2 with a 2.6.32 Linux kernel >>> - Xen 4.0 with a 2.6.32.12 Linux kernel >>> >>> FreeBSD 9 beta i386 paravirtualized on : >>> >>> - >>> - Xen 3.4.2 with a 2.6.32 Linux kernel >>> - Xen 4.0 with a 2.6.32.12 Linux kerne >>> >>> >>> Configuration with mono CPU and 512/1024 Mo RAM, Disks on Dom0 LVM >>> partitions. >>> Plateforms : Dell T610, Dell R200, Dell R210. >>> >>> Cordialement, >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > >