From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sat Oct  5 00:50:03 1996
Return-Path: owner-bugs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id AAA01842
          for bugs-outgoing; Sat, 5 Oct 1996 00:50:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id AAA01836;
          Sat, 5 Oct 1996 00:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
Resent-Date: Sat, 5 Oct 1996 00:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
Resent-Message-Id: <199610050750.AAA01836@freefall.freebsd.org>
Resent-From: gnats (GNATS Management)
Resent-To: freebsd-bugs
Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats@freefall.FreeBSD.org, nsayer@quack.kfu.com
Received: from quack.kfu.com (quack.kfu.com [204.147.226.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA01730
          for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Sat, 5 Oct 1996 00:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from icarus.kfu.com (icarus.kfu.com [204.147.226.3]) by quack.kfu.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id AAA00303 for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Sat, 5 Oct 1996 00:46:52 -0700
Received: by icarus.kfu.com 
        (8.7.5//ident-1.0) id AAA04376; Sat, 5 Oct 1996 00:46:50 -0700 (PDT) 
Message-Id: <199610050746.AAA04376@icarus.kfu.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 1996 00:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: nsayer@quack.kfu.com
Reply-To: nsayer@quack.kfu.com
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2
Subject: kern/1727: Add support for 3C900 to vx
Sender: owner-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


>Number:         1727
>Category:       kern
>Synopsis:       Add support for 3C900 to vx
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
>State:          open
>Class:          support
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Sat Oct  5 00:50:01 PDT 1996
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Nick Sayer
>Organization:
just me
>Release:        FreeBSD 2.2-960801-SNAP i386
>Environment:

Tested on Triton-II board w/3C900.

>Description:

The 3C900 is a new, lower cost version of the 3C590. A friend of mine
has worked extensively with both and claims they're both the same thing.
Patching the probe routine to treat a 3C900 like a 3C590 appears to
work just fine, so far as we can tell.

>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:
	

*** if_vx.c.orig	Sat Oct  5 00:42:10 1996
--- if_vx.c	Sat Oct  5 00:42:59 1996
***************
*** 170,175 ****
--- 170,177 ----
  	pcici_t config_id,
  	pcidi_t device_id)
  {
+    if(device_id == 0x900010b7ul)
+       return "3Com 3c900 EtherLink III PCI";
     if(device_id == 0x590010b7ul)
        return "3Com 3c590 EtherLink III PCI";
     if(device_id == 0x595010b7ul || device_id == 0x595110b7ul ||

>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: