From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jun 27 14:54:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mail.toltecint.net (mail.toltecint.net [65.45.180.172]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB75337B400 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 14:54:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 32789 invoked by uid 85); 27 Jun 2002 21:54:17 -0000 Received: from artslaptop.toltecint.net (HELO ARTSLAPTOP.toltec.biz) (192.168.135.20) by mail.toltecint.net with SMTP; 27 Jun 2002 21:54:14 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.1.6.2.20020627152659.0228f128@mail.toltecint.net> X-Sender: art@mail.toltecint.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 15:54:24 -0600 To: Julian Elischer From: Arthur Peet Subject: Re: bpf/netgraph interaction Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <5.1.1.6.2.20020627122834.022c8f50@mail.toltecint.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Use the Source Luke! Thanks, Obi! :) I REALLY appreciate your response. >as you see, bpf copies are taken before netgraph processing.. >and non-netgraph bridging occurs after that. It appears to me that if I switched the order in which the processing occurs and recompiled the kernel, the function would be absolutely broken. i.e I would never get to the BPF tap. Is this true? Are there any other taps I may access in order to accomplish this goal? On another note - my kernel - 4.4-Release did not have the following line between the two if statements: > ifp->if_ibytes += m->m_pkthdr.len + sizeof (*eh); Is it time for me to upgrade? Thanks again! -Art To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message