From owner-freebsd-doc Thu Feb 14 10:46:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from blackhelicopters.org (geburah.blackhelicopters.org [209.69.178.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EA237B417; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:46:26 -0800 (PST) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by blackhelicopters.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1EIkAD90521; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 13:46:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mwlucas) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 13:46:10 -0500 From: Michael Lucas To: "Bruce A. Mah" Cc: Alexey Zelkin , Valentino Vaschetto , Nik Clayton , Dima Dorfman , doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: replacement Message-ID: <20020214134610.A90492@blackhelicopters.org> References: <20020213230809.I92878@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20020214124806.A7765@ark.cris.net> <200202141639.g1EGdih21528@bmah.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200202141639.g1EGdih21528@bmah.dyndns.org>; from bmah@acm.org on Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 08:39:44AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 08:39:44AM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, Alexey Zelkin wrote: > > > Deadly. If we did it this way, would'nt we have to add new entities every > > > time we get a new port? Even though it's easier than using the > > > tag, I think that it would be a hassle to keep up to date with all the new > > > ports. We don't refer to all the ports in the docs. Heck, we don't refer to most of the ports. Maybe a hundred or so entities, total. That isn't bad. > Before we bikeshed this whole thing to death, can we at least get rid > of the tag first, as there's essentially no argument on this > point?