From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Nov 3 23:40:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx-a.qnet.com (mx-a.qnet.com [209.221.198.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF5F37B4C5 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 23:40:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from cello.qnet.com (root@cello.qnet.com [209.221.198.10]) by mx-a.qnet.com (8.9.1a/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA18141; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 23:40:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from STORK (56k-socal-00-47.dial.qnet.com [209.221.198.62]) by cello.qnet.com (8.9.0/8.9.1) with SMTP id XAA13209; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 23:40:01 -0800 (PST) From: "Heredity Choice" To: "Mike Johnson" , Subject: RE: Compaq 1850 Thunderlan Problems Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 23:32:11 -0800 Message-ID: <000301c04631$588e5a80$4fc7ddd1@STORK> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0004_01C045EE.4A6B1A80" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.5600 In-Reply-To: <418E68E524A8D311ACCE00508B78866A0107CF3B@DENXCH> Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C045EE.4A6B1A80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Compaq 1850 Thunderlan ProblemsNothing from Compaq is standard. Paul Smith I have reproduced this problems with multiple versions of FreeBSD (2.x,3.x,4.x). My assumption is that Compaq has implemented the TI Thunderlan chipset in a "nonstandard" way and thereby broken the driver. Has anyone else seen/solved this problem? Any help/suggestions would be appreciated. Michael S. Johnson ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C045EE.4A6B1A80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Compaq 1850 Thunderlan Problems
Nothing=20 from Compaq is standard.
 
Paul=20 Smith

I have reproduced this problems with = multiple=20 versions of FreeBSD (2.x,3.x,4.x).  My assumption is that Compaq = has=20 implemented the TI Thunderlan chipset in a "nonstandard" way and = thereby=20 broken the driver.

Has anyone else seen/solved this = problem?  Any=20 help/suggestions would be appreciated.

Michael S. Johnson=20

------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C045EE.4A6B1A80-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message