Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:46:39 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 204904] Making CKSUMFILES more flexible by allowing USES clauses to add files there Message-ID: <bug-204904-13-CJIcS01Gw7@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-204904-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-204904-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204904 --- Comment #2 from yuri@rawbw.com --- DISTFILES is usually sufficient. But I have 2 sets of distfiles: originally downloaded (DISTFILES1), and generated by fetch (DISTFILES2). distinfo should have DISTFILES1 and DISTFILES2, but MASTER_BACKUP_SITE should only have DISTFILES2. This is why I prefer to keep the distinction between CKSUMFILES and DISTFILES. There should also be BACKUP_FILES variable. Usually they are all the same, but not in my case. NodeJS downloads things in the process, that's why it calls for a very complex fetch stage with its own ins and outs, all of which are distfiles. The result overall looks like download, with custom process running inside. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-204904-13-CJIcS01Gw7>