Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:46:39 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 204904] Making CKSUMFILES more flexible by allowing USES clauses to add files there
Message-ID:  <bug-204904-13-CJIcS01Gw7@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-204904-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-204904-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204904

--- Comment #2 from yuri@rawbw.com ---
DISTFILES is usually sufficient. But I have 2 sets of distfiles: originally
downloaded (DISTFILES1), and generated by fetch (DISTFILES2). distinfo should
have DISTFILES1 and DISTFILES2, but MASTER_BACKUP_SITE should only have
DISTFILES2. This is why I prefer to keep the distinction between CKSUMFILES and
DISTFILES. There should also be BACKUP_FILES variable. Usually they are all the
same, but not in my case.

NodeJS downloads things in the process, that's why it calls for a very complex
fetch stage with its own ins and outs, all of which are distfiles. The result
overall looks like download, with custom process running inside.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-204904-13-CJIcS01Gw7>