From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org  Sat Sep 19 07:20:48 2015
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CB59CF88F;
 Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:20:48 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59825105F;
 Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:20:48 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org)
Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id 584B81395; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:20:48 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:20:48 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@com.bat.ru>,
 Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org,
 svn-ports-all <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>,
 svn-ports-head <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r396998 - head/net/samba36
Message-ID: <20150919072048.GA86129@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201509151622.t8FGMXQY074723@repo.freebsd.org>
 <CALdFvJE17udNUQ=Y5JxwHphn2TWRMh-213_LfP-YOM3MN1Qx2A@mail.gmail.com>
 <0FAE77426236E9E47E15BFC1@atuin.in.mat.cc>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0FAE77426236E9E47E15BFC1@atuin.in.mat.cc>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>, 
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:20:48 -0000

On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 09:05:52AM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> +--On 19 septembre 2015 01:20:59 +0200 "Timur I. Bakeyev"
> <timur@com.bat.ru> wrote:
> | Was it really neessary to bump port revision for the change
> 
> I'll cut at that.  Yes, it was, the resulting package changed, so, yes,
> bumping PORTREVISION is mandatory.

Oh please Mathieu, not this "read PHB, no thinking required" bullcrap
again.  Apparently you don't realize how much of PITA these bumps for
no real reason can be.  Port revision should be bumped if there was
something *wrong* with the previous package, or rebuild is *really*
necessary due to breaking change in its dependencies.

Perhaps frequent rebuilds is not a problem for binary package users or
multicore machines with shitloads of RAM and fast storage, but 1) if I
wanted to use binary packages, I guess Debian would be a better choice
as they've got it well before we did, and 2) I don't have, and hardly
ever will have that high-profile hardware.

./danfe