Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:06:14 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: QA script error (libc++) Message-ID: <CAGwOe2b__7o8MYG5n%2Bb3LYXCvfs_i8%2BXFzhV637-66D6TL57dQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20160625082348.GG20495@graf.pompo.net> References: <CAGwOe2ZMHbf2uCV=T9cKEKF4F8XE8XBA4wUt7H4DXB9nCOMH%2BA@mail.gmail.com> <20160625082348.GG20495@graf.pompo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Thierry Thomas <thierry@freebsd.org> wrot=
e:
> Hello,
>
> Le ven 24 jui 16 =C3=A0 8:16:26 +0200, Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa <fernand=
o.apesteguia@gmail.com>
> =C3=A9crivait :
>> One of my ports is written in C++. It links agains libc++ that is in
>> base (/usr/src/contrib/libc++). The port still builds fine and works
>> but the QA scripts show an error complaining about the executable
>> being linked to libc++ without the library being listed as an actual
>> dependency and it suggests to add the following line to the Makefile:
>>
>> LIB_DEPENDS+=3Dlibc++.so:devel/libc++
>
> Same here for my port graphics/cimg. I guess that QA script is not yet
> ready, and ATM it's safer to ignore its advices.
That's my thought too. Also portlint doesn't seem to be in sync with
the new stuff in ports. In my case it complains about the TIMESTAMP
new line in distinfo and the directories not found in the ports
collection (due to the removal of ${PORTSDIR} while defining the
dependencies).
Thanks!
> --
> Th. Thomas.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGwOe2b__7o8MYG5n%2Bb3LYXCvfs_i8%2BXFzhV637-66D6TL57dQ>