From owner-freebsd-small Sat Mar 3 17:57:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from oneway.com (daedal.oneway.com [205.252.89.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832E837B719 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 17:57:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jay@oneway.com) Received: from localhost (jay@localhost) by oneway.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA36897; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 21:11:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jay@oneway.com) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 21:11:59 -0500 (EST) From: Jay Kuri To: "Chad R. Larson" Cc: Brennan Stehling , freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: picobsd and alternatives In-Reply-To: <200103012303.QAA11839@freeway.dcfinc.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > This seems like a perfect use for the union filesystem. Boot your > system from the CD, but keep the config files (and local customizations > to them) on the floppy. Is the union filesystem stable enough for this? I've been interested in doing something along these lines but I haven't because there are big warnings all over about using union_fs... but I know some work has been done on it since FreeBSD 3.x. Has anyone done this? Also, does anyone understand the difference between mount -o union and mount_union? Jay To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message