Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 00:47:17 +0400 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.2-PRE /boot/loader Message-ID: <20061003204717.GA60747@rambler-co.ru> In-Reply-To: <200610031558.38557.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <20061003164750.GA844@seth.augenstein.ten> <20061003194735.GA43305@rambler-co.ru> <20061003194855.GB43305@rambler-co.ru> <200610031558.38557.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 03:58:38PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday 03 October 2006 15:48, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:47:35PM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > Hi John, > > >=20 > > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 03:00:40PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 03 October 2006 12:55, Norbert Augenstein wrote: > > > > > Hi list, > > > > > i have just updated to 6.2-PRERELEASE and GRUB is unable to u= se > > > > > the new /boot/loader. Ending in an endless loop rebooting aft= er > > > > > selecting FreeBSD. > > > > > As a workaround it was possible to chainload FreeBSD. > > > > > Further investigation shows that /boot/loader.old is woking. > > > > >=20 > > > > > So what can cause the new loader to fail? > > > > > I have not set CFLAGS / CPUTYPE in /etc/make.conf > > > > > =20 > > > > > No other problems , em device is working fine here:) > > > >=20 > > > > Talk to ru@ about his changes to make it use high memory by default. > > > >=20 > > > Do you mean that "my" (uncommitted) changes can cause this or > > > are you trying to say that making it use high and more memory > > > for heap by default would probably be a good idea? > > >=20 > > Hmm, well. I forgot that I've already committed them. But > > it doesn't use high memory by default, only if bzip2 support > > is activated. >=20 > I thought you changed that from '#ifdef LOADER_BZIP2_SUPPORT' to '#if 1' = in=20 > your patches so it now always uses high memory? >=20 In experimental uncommitted patches, yes. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQFFIsxVqRfpzJluFF4RAj7AAJjyPU3YC1CYQVmF3RDB5CnzNDCgAJ468zPA V3Rx+CF2RCpGNXAjEkjxUQ== =1C3i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061003204717.GA60747>