From nobody Fri Oct 18 13:13:21 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XVQBR51TJz5ZBfn for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 13:13:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Received: from fout-a7-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a7-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.150]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XVQBQ4KsWz4NRF for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 13:13:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=f-m.fm header.s=fm2 header.b=Qzj3O4hd; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=dUig5mB9; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of void@f-m.fm designates 103.168.172.150 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=void@f-m.fm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=f-m.fm Received: from phl-compute-07.internal (phl-compute-07.phl.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382A4138020F for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 09:13:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-07.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 18 Oct 2024 09:13:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=f-m.fm; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1729257214; x=1729343614; bh=IXtp1lvQd6 +3a8yWZ6ukKltKI0qLbYvhbZrkQFD4EII=; b=Qzj3O4hdh6YhQg6PN54Xen1Y26 t8oPj0/2O3BFDm1Rc3H0WQdF/vZdqEJDe9uler1l1wjJyi09bxywPp6eugX2Ixg0 CvgwzdlTbHAac6+Iqjmoh5PE1YWjYmOQmFTD/B3o4/nY+OONW+LmZvOEMSF0nKsD b3Zj/s5b53Hl5qnjUCSswVDq/uVSfnINcOPcryAULV8iv5plJQtTneFeyu0WGP1C O2gWHa2kWAQDi5Ql3mgdqfatUProh1I2E9u6g2P7FHYGxDGvs+MR4smtoAvZ7gVy gtY9pEYu+5mF8PTPK/zrbOOj8CwNBQKDI9oCq446wNNYaGIa49QDE1Y9f5KA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1729257214; x=1729343614; bh=IXtp1lvQd6+3a8yWZ6ukKltKI0qL bYvhbZrkQFD4EII=; b=dUig5mB9WCzeyfAoUNVSIfcBTAt7PtuTUaOFITJnc8Yn vlppe7Fyf6Ww0PwMiLwVYIbHFRpchniPPc3NVwVLt+/UwzqiYaT5FKAjBH5nP1Dm 1XEF0qYf8D6uxN/8H1ETVynrHp0nQhSQWkn/3hNylUVlLXjNA1Q/ZZ3xNDdUZsvu iloIo469emitmOyMiPq5nT+VbS4RhzCwi6Xb6egnfDR7ndnWrs3eBVnaAV1gHM0G d/RwlE+qyT524gEEpYaaujQsR8VRASMRl+zsEYOQFNeW7sPc00n1dIBxfSYtGNrO kOF6gwcgCSItipQrIOoBMtmL4bOgqDMEpCDhH+GGqQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrvdehfedgiedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuf fkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvhhoihguuceovhhoihgusehfqdhm rdhfmheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdfhheeuteejudffkefhtdfhfeekgedtvdeite evgfejtdfgfeffhfeuieeltdeinecuffhomhgrihhnpehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhgnecu vehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepvhhoihguse hfqdhmrdhfmhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghp thhtohepfhhrvggvsghsugdqnhgvthesfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i2541463c:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 09:13:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 14:13:21 +0100 From: void To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge Message-ID: References: <20240912181618.7895d10ad5ff2ebae9883192@gmail.com> List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.58 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.982]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[f-m.fm,none]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[f-m.fm:s=fm2,messagingengine.com:s=fm2]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:103.168.172.128/27]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[103.168.172.150:from]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[f-m.fm:+,messagingengine.com:+]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209242, ipnet:103.168.172.0/24, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4XVQBQ4KsWz4NRF X-Spamd-Bar: --- On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 07:28:49AM -0400, Cheng Cui wrote: >The patch is a TCP congestion control algorithm improvement. So to >be clear, it only impacts a TCP data sender. These hosts are just traffic >forwarders, not TCP sender/receiver. > >I can send you a patch for the FreeBSD 14/stable to test performance >improvement. sure! I'm happy to test >If you think FreeBSD 14.x releases are critical to your business, or you >can't wait until FreeBSD 15 is released, you can file a request to add this >patch in the 14.x. I think https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ is where a >user can file such request. If it is approved, which I am not sure if >it can be approved, then maybe it can be included in the next 14.x release. thank you, I'll try :D --