From owner-freebsd-security Fri Oct 5 10:36:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.sentex.ca (smtp1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C13337B401 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2001 10:36:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from simoeon.sentex.net (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smtp1.sentex.ca (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f95HaFW29980; Fri, 5 Oct 2001 13:36:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20011005133013.059bc9c0@marble.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 13:30:45 -0400 To: Ng Pheng Siong , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: Amavis + Linux scanners In-Reply-To: <20011006004613.B1992@madcap.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I tried the f-prot scanner for Linux and it seemed to work ok. Why not run the native FreeBSD version of the NAI/McAffee scanner ? It works well. ---Mike At 12:46 AM 10/6/01 +0800, Ng Pheng Siong wrote: >Hi, > >I'm looking at running Amavis with Postfix. The Amavis site pointed to >several scanner products which predictably offer Linux but not FreeBSD >versions. > >Has anyone run Amavis on FreeBSD with Linux scanners? Any caveats, gotchas, >better option? > >TIA. Cheers. >-- >Ng Pheng Siong * http://www.post1.com/home/ngps > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message