From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 19:49:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA38106567B; Sat, 6 Sep 2008 19:49:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1178A8FC1D; Sat, 6 Sep 2008 19:49:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m86Jmlfm004208; Sat, 6 Sep 2008 21:48:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m86JmiXk004205; Sat, 6 Sep 2008 21:48:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 21:48:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Kevin Kinsey In-Reply-To: <48C2C9F6.30508@daleco.biz> Message-ID: <20080906214815.A4204@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080905023638.U53812@phantom.math.miami.edu> <48C0EB58.4060307@FreeBSD.org> <20080905140820.B8020@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <48C1F44F.7030300@FreeBSD.org> <20080906094507.Q19981@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <48C2C9F6.30508@daleco.biz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Kris Kennaway , jef moskot , freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Google Chrome X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:49:44 -0000 >> i don't know if it was discovered or will be, i don't need that discovery, >> because i'm sure they do. >> >> everyone is honest for 100$, most for $1000, very few for $10000, almost >> nobody for >$1000000, that's wy everybody should avoid LARGE corporation. > > So then, business who talk about protecting their "IP" > aren't talking about "Internet Protocol", and aren't > discussing "Intellectual Property", they are actually > making an "Indecent Proposal?" [1] [2] in most cases - yes.