Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 20:14:03 +0100 (CET) From: Marc Schneiders <marc@schneiders.org> To: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net> Cc: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: arplookup failed: host is not on local network( Re: adding some new IPs from a different subnet) Message-ID: <20030111200608.U57051-100000@voo.doo.net> In-Reply-To: <C251CBAE-2590-11D7-8585-003065715DA8@pursued-with.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, at 10:16 [=GMT-0800], Kevin Stevens wrote: > I saw the note about the incorrect mask on the second 10. address; and > agree that it needs fixing, but I don't think that was the source of > the log messages. I ran into the same thing when I had different NICS > on different IP subnets on the same physical network some time ago - > that's how I remembered the setting. That's why there's a sysctl for > it - depending on your configuration, it isn't actually an error. I see the same error message since Dec 29 04:46:02 about an IP that belongs to another of my servers, and which is not at all in the configuration. Nor was the ifconfig changed at that time. Neither did I rebuild the kernel or world at that time. The machine was not rebooted at that time. So what?? However, to be completely honest, the IP has a PTR that is identical with the PTR of one of the alias IPs on the machine. This did not change either on Dec. 29. Diagram A 100.100.100.1 IN PTR papa.angry.com 100.100.100.2 (alias) IN PTR host.domain.com 100.100.100.3 (alias) IN PTR mama.angry.net B 200.200.200.1 IN PTR host.domain.com Now host A complains that the IP of host B is not on the local network. Please, enlighten me :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030111200608.U57051-100000>