Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 23:25:54 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@FreeBSD.org> To: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Dragonfly Mail Agent (dma) in the base system Message-ID: <86czk8rhcd.fsf@next.des.no> In-Reply-To: <CAPyFy2Cu-TJk5zkJ5qGgJa62b7BVE__Hv2huM-f-ALzxo9AiQw@mail.gmail.com> (Ed Maste's message of "Thu, 27 Jan 2022 16:34:10 -0500") References: <CAPyFy2Cu-TJk5zkJ5qGgJa62b7BVE__Hv2huM-f-ALzxo9AiQw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> writes: > I am interested in determining whether dma is a viable minimal base > system MTA, and if not what gaps remain. It cannot. Ask bapt@ who was the one to import it, and later abandon the idea of making it our default MTA. The reason was that it does not have a default domain setting, so it cannot handle email from cron, periodic etc. where the recipient is just a user name (usually =E2=80=9Croo= t=E2=80=9D), and the devs were not willing to add that feature. I have email as far back as 2015 on the subject. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86czk8rhcd.fsf>