From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jan 11 08:00:35 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id IAA01734 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 11 Jan 1995 08:00:35 -0800 Received: from hermes.cybernetics.net (hermes.cybernetics.net [198.80.51.103]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id IAA01728 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 1995 08:00:30 -0800 Received: (from james@localhost) by hermes.cybernetics.net (8.6.8/8.6.6) id LAA21357 for hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 11 Jan 1995 11:10:31 -0500 From: James Robinson Message-Id: <199501111610.LAA21357@hermes.cybernetics.net> Subject: Re: 2.0 Install comments To: hackers@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD hackers) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 1995 11:10:30 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 1511 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk OK -- specifying the IP address would have worked as well (Ah, hindsight), but a comment to that effect (or a way to tailor a mini /etc/hosts) would have been that extra bit of gravy that really made thanksgiving special, you know :-) ? One other thing which may or may not be widespread (but happened on both the machines I was installing on). I could not use a method of network installation that used TCP. I could not do the ftp option (it would not work). I escaped into a subshell and tried to manually ftp as well as just telnet to a site, and things acted really strangely: 1) Connection would be established fine -- it asked for my login name w/o a problem. 2) When it came to the password, the connection just hung. I cranked up TCPdump on a local machine, and it showed that the machine running the 2.0 install was still sending packets, but no replies / acks were being generated. This occurred with all sorts of destination machines -- VMS, OSF, as well as FreeBSD. As fate would have it, it would be the "PASS XXXXX" packet of the ftp session that would get resent over and over. Talk about the need to get cleartext off of the network :-)! This sounds a lot like the problem that the person is having with the DECserver. All I know is that it went away once the installation was completed. The only funny thing here is the lack of DNS. Opinions / explanations? Installation over NFS worked great (I thought, hmmm -- UDP used here, mabye it'll work. Thankfully so!) James