Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Jun 1998 07:52:06 +0100 (BST)
From:      Duncan Barclay <dmlb@ragnet.demon.co.uk>
To:        Chris Dillon <cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us>
Cc:        freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
Subject:   Re: PS/2 Mouse resolution.
Message-ID:  <XFMail.980618075206.dmlb@computer.my.domain>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980618000109.2382B-100000@duey.hs.wolves.k12.mo.us>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 18-Jun-98 Chris Dillon wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 1998, Greg Lehey wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, 11 June 1998 at 18:34:38 -0500, Chris Dillon wrote:
>> > On Thu, 11 Jun 1998, Duncan Barclay wrote:
>> >
>> >> Just upgraded my motherboard to one with a PS/2 port on it (FIC PT-2007,
>> >> 430TX).
>> >>
>> >> I moved my mouse (Logicitech MouseMan) from sio0 to the PS/2 port and it
>> >> is now
>> >> "slower" and a pain to use under X. I guess the resolution has increased,
>> >> can
>> >> moused be used to fake it back top where it was before?
>> >>
>> >> I've tried upping the X acceleration but don't really like it, feels
>> >> wrong.
>> >>
>> >> I don't want to go back the serial port, I want it for the console of
>> >> my (new) crash box.
>> >
>> > I noticed something similar when I bought this new trackball, which sits
>> > on the PS/2 port.  The cursor zips across the screen fast enough, but
>> > selecting text in an xterm is a whole different story.  It used to be that
>> > when I clicked/dragged to select text the "reverse" selection followed the
>> > cursor perfectly.  Now it lags behind the cursor and updates in bursts.
>> > Weird, eh?  Anyone know why this happens?
>> 
>> Interesting.  The "updates in bursts" looks like an interrupt problem.
>> I've had similar problems, but I hadn't associated them with the
>> change from serial to PS/2.  I'm currently using a MouseMan on a
>> serial port on my laptop, and it works fine, but I've been having real
>> problems on my "real" machine with a PS/2 port.  I thought it was the
>> screen resolution (1600x1200) which was causing the problems, but now
>> I'll investigate more carefully.
>> 
> 
> If it were an interrupt problem, wouldn't the cursor itself move jumpily
> and not just the inverse selection?  It moves even more fluidly than with
> my serial mouse (of course, it was a cheap low-res mouse).
> 
> 
> -- Chris Dillon - cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us - cdillon@inter-linc.net
> /* FreeBSD: The fastest and most stable server OS on the planet.
>    For Intel x86 and compatibles (SPARC and Alpha under development)
>    (http://www.freebsd.org)                                         */
> 
> 
Well I managed to find my slowness the problem after RTFM, it appears that
when my mouse is used as a PS/2 device it's resolution is lower than it is
when used as a serial device. Found the -r flag to moused to be useful!

Duncan

---
________________________________________________________________________
Duncan Barclay          | God smiles upon the little children,
dmlb@ragnet.demon.co.uk | the alcoholics, and the permanently stoned.
________________________________________________________________________

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.980618075206.dmlb>