From owner-freebsd-bugs  Wed Apr 16 04:44:47 1997
Return-Path: <owner-bugs>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA21678
          for bugs-outgoing; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 04:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.crl.com (mail.crl.com [165.113.1.22])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA21663
          for <freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 04:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from economic.acnit.ac.ru by mail.crl.com with SMTP id AA15833
  (5.65c/IDA-1.5 for <freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>); Wed, 16 Apr 1997 04:42:15 -0700
Received: (from bazilio@localhost)
          by economic.acnit.ac.ru (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id OAA00253; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 14:39:25 +0400 (MSD)
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 14:39:25 +0400 (MSD)
From: "Vasily V. Grechishnikov" <bazilio@economic.acnit.ac.ru>
To: John Hay <jhay@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za>
Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: IPX and Tulip needs promiscuous mode ??
In-Reply-To: <199704151352.PAA10330@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za>
Message-Id: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970416143723.237A-100000@economic>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 15 Apr 1997, John Hay wrote:

> > 	May be Tulip device driver contain some errors? I haven't expirience
> > to analyze /sys/pci/if_de.c ( 130K ) ;-) .
> > 
> > 	Any suggestions?
> > 
> 
> I have never tried it with the deX driver. What is the order of the
> devices in the network_interfaces variable in /etc/sysconfig? If
> the de0 device is after the ed0 devices try to put it in front
> and see if it make a difference.
> 

	I reorder my sysconfigs network_interfaces="de0 ed.. lo0", and
IPX frowarding works ok !! But ,why ? 

> Please let me know.
> 
> John
> -- 
> John Hay -- John.Hay@mikom.csir.co.za
>