From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 06:01:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AACA61065676 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 06:01:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbeeble@gmail.com) Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60CD18FC1A for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 06:01:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbeeble@gmail.com) Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so1930149yxm.13 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:01:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=6tR16+aQ3iF0Vtua1UOXI9c6AS0W+aHSgZfRjcwij0I=; b=NYWD5TIYaEFsYvSdlKAsArLElYe6iPls44CUnvBkpPTMXN4Y/KLrjX+WOY+MWY0btX jLfxvH6fWGYQ0UjgfRHYXbqFKUZthjzHRG3YQlegS2fRmIdeGOv3SSNf5FvRYjkE8qw+ i3+Eedu95M8ASXyTdtSTcxSt/I/HLrSkEK7xU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=rc/u+TaXkgeOf00dtPvW4hFjsgZjqlgMgOXrmeIl55SThEr6GPc5XM39M2ZYpg8f3v dLlyExBWlbeK1Kvq8WqhQ7pOOq2oYPzLsfJgjdDl46L/lqnvvZV7qzKULpchuXP+Wu4R 6j/KYEjYyiP/DzMcteYyIeUlXeY8e+varMYvk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.42.12 with SMTP id u12mr999477ybj.116.1238565691916; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:01:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49D2F5BC.2080803@bsd.ee> References: <49CA3795.609@bsd.ee> <49CA4498.2020007@bsd.ee> <49CA837D.3040202@barryp.org> <9bbcef730903251301u5ca861f5vcbe7622630cb180e@mail.gmail.com> <49D0AFFC.2090306@bsd.ee> <49D2F5BC.2080803@bsd.ee> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 02:01:31 -0400 Message-ID: <5f67a8c40903312301t5f460e2eh4d509c69fc39934a@mail.gmail.com> From: Zaphod Beeblebrox To: Andrei Kolu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: 32bit filesystem limitations X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 06:01:33 -0000 On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Andrei Kolu wrote: > I forgot to try ZFS on that particular server- maybe that one would be > better alternative? I have experience with ZFS on terabyte sized volumes and > had no ill effects so far- what about really large filesystems? I know that > ZFS is considered experimental. I've got 1.5T disks in my ZFS server. I don't boot from them and I havn't labelled them (added "ad6" and so on to the zfs array). After hearing that various fdisk things couldn't see beyond 1.2T, I got to wondering if the whole disks were being used. It appears that they are. Now ZFS on solaris seems to insist that you initialize (ie: use their fdisk) the disks before adding them to ZFS. I've also recently added a bunch of 1.5T disks to a Solaris install ... and it seems happy to use the whole disk, too.