From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 16 15:43:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789FF1065670 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 15:43:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.vlsi.ee.noda.tus.ac.jp (sekine00.ee.noda.sut.ac.jp [133.31.107.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F10F68FC13 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 15:43:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alph.allbsd.org (p3028-ipbf608funabasi.chiba.ocn.ne.jp [125.175.94.28]) (user=hrs mech=DIGEST-MD5 bits=128) by mail.vlsi.ee.noda.tus.ac.jp (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6GFgqAB048453 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 17 Jul 2011 00:43:02 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by alph.allbsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6GFgoX4063155; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 00:42:52 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 00:42:48 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20110717.004248.48765964696292481.hrs@allbsd.org> To: dudu@dudu.ro From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: References: X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Sun_Jul_17_00_42_48_2011_981)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.5 (mail.vlsi.ee.noda.tus.ac.jp [133.31.107.40]); Sun, 17 Jul 2011 00:43:02 +0900 (JST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=14.0 tests=BAYES_40, CONTENT_TYPE_PRESENT, RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL, SPF_SOFTFAIL, X_MAILER_PRESENT autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.vlsi.ee.noda.tus.ac.jp Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FIB separation X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 15:43:11 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Jul_17_00_42_48_2011_981)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Vlad Galu wrote in : du> Hello, du> du> A couple of years ago, Stef Walter proposed a patch[1] that enforced du> the scope of routing messages. The general consesus was that the best du> approach would be the OpenBSD way - transporting the FIB number in the du> message and letting the user applications filter out unwanted du> messages. du> du> Are there any plans to tackle this before 9.0? I am looking into this and investigating other possible extensions in rtsock messages such as addition of a fib member to rt_msghdr. I am not sure it can be done before 9.0, though... -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Jul_17_00_42_48_2011_981)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk4hsXgACgkQTyzT2CeTzy1r7ACfbgol4iQfmS6VrGRpxJXyNJhh c3IAnRTg+4PdOqLwm9jkL6HZApfW/SiA =UC+i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Jul_17_00_42_48_2011_981)----