Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 11:27:58 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 188938] New port: net-mgmt/nsca-ng Monitoring command acceptor Message-ID: <bug-188938-13-SjsUB1qFTo@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-188938-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-188938-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188938 John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Patch Ready |Needs Triage CC| |cs@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- Carlo jumped the gun. Before this can be considered "patch-ready", we need to see some verification about it's quality. Unless Carlo wants to assign the port to himself at his own risk: In order of preference, examples of what I'm looking for are: 1) "poudriere testport" or "poudriere bulk -t" logs 2) Redports or tinderbox logs 3) "make check-plist" followed by "make stage-qa" output (https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-testing.html) Also, please run "portlint" and paste the output. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-188938-13-SjsUB1qFTo>