From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 9 07:32:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92A216A400; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 07:32:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (creme-brulee.marcuscom.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7751013C461; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 07:32:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l197WYrJ082637; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 02:32:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Michael Nottebrock In-Reply-To: <200702090758.18317.lofi@freebsd.org> References: <200702090634.56455.lofi@freebsd.org> <1171000334.67014.18.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <200702090758.18317.lofi@freebsd.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-f/yzFaTYH1G0IMUya1wx" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 02:32:30 -0500 Message-Id: <1171006350.67014.26.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HAL on FreeBSD 5.5 redux X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 07:32:31 -0000 --=-f/yzFaTYH1G0IMUya1wx Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 07:58 +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Friday, 9. February 2007 06:52, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >=20 > > There was a recent change that went into HAL to favor atapicam > > installations over those without. I wonder if this could be causing > > problems. Please provide an lshal. >=20 > Oh, and I really should mention this, the atapicam devices work fine with= the=20 > current HAL, the problems are just with the atapicd devices (i.e. with=20 > atapicam turned off, that was the regression testing I did). Then what is this lshal from? It looks good (i.e. this problem should not occur). The cdrom->channel should be 1 based on this output. I need an lshal from a machine exhibiting this problem. Can you also add: fprintf(stderr, "Reading props from %s\n", parent); After line 85 in hfp-cdrom.c, and provide the resulting output. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-f/yzFaTYH1G0IMUya1wx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFzCOOb2iPiv4Uz4cRAvZ9AKCvMcN1FLDwLuPyM2YdACGyGE2dZQCgggI7 g+WBiH33yHCzmWyGnE/ZdOQ= =8rhJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-f/yzFaTYH1G0IMUya1wx--