From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Sun Jun 21 21:57:52 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98AC9336521; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:57:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rene@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49qmcc3Wd8z3T25; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:57:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rene@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1185) id 60187190D1; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:57:52 +0000 From: Rene Ladan To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: takefu@airport.fm, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r538214 - in head/net-mgmt/ipv6mon: . files Message-ID: <20200621215752.GA64266@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <202006081317.058DHTW2074030@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:57:52 -0000 On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 11:54:05PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Mon, 8 Jun 2020, Rene Ladan wrote: > > Log: > > net-mgmt/ipv6mon: unexpire by downloading from GitHub > > > > Use the correct path in ipv6mon(8) and ipv6mon.conf(5) > > Bump PORTREVISION > > > > PR: 242414 > > Submitted by: takefu > > > +USE_GCC= any > > Hmm, with all due respect, I would be very hesitant for ports having > such a dependency on USE_GCC=any. That's usually an indication that > the software is unmaintained beyond hope ... or really weird. > Ah, good to know. Guess I was confused with USE_GCC=yes. /me writes 100 times ... ;) > Is there any chance to get this to build with default compilers? > We can try. René