From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Jan  6 03:10:18 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id DAA28116
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 6 Jan 1997 03:10:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dfw-ix9.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix9.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.9])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id DAA28110
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 6 Jan 1997 03:10:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from baloon.mimi.com (sjx-ca37-25.ix.netcom.com [204.31.236.217]) by dfw-ix9.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id DAA10644; Mon, 6 Jan 1997 03:09:36 -0800
Received: (from asami@localhost) by baloon.mimi.com (8.8.4/8.6.12) id DAA24386; Mon, 6 Jan 1997 03:09:34 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 03:09:34 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199701061109.DAA24386@baloon.mimi.com>
To: hoek@freenet.hamilton.on.ca
CC: ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970106044450.29764B-100000@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca> (message from Tim Vanderhoek on Mon, 6 Jan 1997 04:46:38 -0500 (EST))
Subject: Re: Big Brother and FreeBSD CD-ROM
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Outa curiosity, what happens if someone other than Walnut Creek decides to
 * print some CDs?  Do they have to go through each port to check for these
 * kinds of things, or...

Unless the author gave permission to "ok to distribute this on any
CD-ROM", I would think so.

Actually, I was thinking about this exact problem, maybe I should
leave the NO_CDROM in there, commented out, with a comment about how
WC got a special permission but others need to get this done
themselves.  Hmm.  That's ugly.

Satoshi