Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:57:19 +0900 From: "Hye-Shik Chang" <hyeshik@gmail.com> To: "Alexander Botero-Lowry" <alexbl@freebsd.org> Cc: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Python 2.5.1 upgrade as a new default Message-ID: <4f0b69dc0706102357q54d69fy7e6bdb2010f3862e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20070611064323.1F1B83B49A@cherenkov.geekfire.com> References: <4f0b69dc0706101154r8a5b51btd81ffdc5a2321de3@mail.gmail.com> <20070610204124.DABA53B487@cherenkov.geekfire.com> <4f0b69dc0706102307q508d4161pdc8a7f651fd6727c@mail.gmail.com> <20070611064323.1F1B83B49A@cherenkov.geekfire.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/11/07, Alexander Botero-Lowry <alexbl@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Ah. Thank you! rev5 upgrades lang/python25 and document > > ports to 2.5.1. I'll check the git repository and see if rev5 can > > integrated into git easily. > > > cool! > > > > I'm concerned that we haven't fixed the problems that were found during > > > pointyhat runs, portmgr@ wants this to be built on pointyhat before it > > > goes into ports. I think we should be careful to make sure we've fixed > > > the known build failures and then have pav@ do a pointyhat run for us. > > > > If I remember correctly, I fixed almost all errors found by pointyhat > > in rev4. If we can get another pointyhat result for the current tree, > > it will help the validation of the patch. > I have an mbox file with about 40 breaks.. > http://people.freebsd.org/~alexbl/python25-failures.mbox.gz > > If you've already fixed those, very cool, otherwise should fix them before > doing another run. > I've fixed all of them in rev4. :) However, the test is little bit outdated now, another run may find some new errors. Hye-Shik
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4f0b69dc0706102357q54d69fy7e6bdb2010f3862e>