From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr  8 22:09:56 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5377A10656F4
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  8 Apr 2009 22:09:56 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (backbone.deglitch.com
	[IPv6:2001:16d8:fffb:4::abba])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048308FC22
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  8 Apr 2009 22:09:56 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from DSPAM-Daemon (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AF688FC9E
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Thu,  9 Apr 2009 01:54:56 +0400 (MSD)
Received: from orion.SpringDaemons.com (unknown [77.232.3.143])
	by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 10F5B8FC59;
	Thu,  9 Apr 2009 00:29:27 +0400 (MSD)
Received: from orion (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by orion.SpringDaemons.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 781283981A;
	Thu,  9 Apr 2009 00:29:30 +0400 (MSD)
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 00:29:18 +0400
From: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org>
To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>
Message-Id: <20090409002918.e48eecde.stas@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <49DCF1F2.3040501@p6m7g8.com>
References: <49DCCC93.2010209@p6m7g8.com>
	<1239216349.50237.2.camel@hood.oook.cz>
	<49DCF1F2.3040501@p6m7g8.com>
Organization: The FreeBSD Project
X-XMPP: ssedov@jabber.ru
X-Voice: +7 916 849 20 23
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2  A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581
X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Processed: Thu Apr  9 01:54:56 2009
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 1.0000
X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 98689409 chance of being spam
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0023
X-DSPAM-Signature: 49dd1d30967001736490404
Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" <ports@FreeBSD.org>, ruby@FreeBSD.org, pav@FreeBSD.org,
	portmgr@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [rubygems-]: Request for Review and -exp Run
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:09:56 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:50:26 -0400
"Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> mentioned:

> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> >> Diff:
> >> -----
> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~pgollucci/rubygems.diff
> > 
> > If only the individual ports are changed, we does not need to waste
> > resources on exp run. Just run these seven ports in Tinderbox...
> 
> Would have helped if you looked at the diff or did you and that still applies ?
> 
> Those seven ports have the deltas listed in *ADDITION* to the first 3
> which are global across all remaining rubygem-* ports (except maybe mongrel 
> and merb)
> 
> 
> $ grep -c Index: rubygems.diff
> 111

I don't think Exprun is really required. We can run this on tinderbox - ruby
ports builds pretty fast. The change seems to be straightforward and limited
to the affected ports only.

- -- 
Stanislav Sedov
ST4096-RIPE
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEARECAAYFAkndCSoACgkQK/VZk+smlYEPNQCfaZJD/LzuQ2ckl+qx8qV/Udjb
orYAn2h5syUNYJet8/nBH58oUTfO2NpO
=Xplo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

!DSPAM:49dd1d30967001736490404!