From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Apr 17 18:52: 6 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A2737B43E
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 18:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net)
Received: (from bright@localhost)
	by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f3I1pmW03912;
	Tue, 17 Apr 2001 18:51:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 18:51:48 -0700
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
Cc: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@technokratis.com>,
	Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>,
	Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>,
	Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net>,
	"current @ freebsd . org" <current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Kernel preemption, yes or no? (was: Filesystem gets a huge performance boost)
Message-ID: <20010417185148.D976@fw.wintelcom.net>
References: <20010417212045.B14803@technokratis.com> <Pine.LNX.4.20.0104180120390.14246-100000@www.everquick.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0104180120390.14246-100000@www.everquick.net>; from eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net on Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 01:35:44AM +0000
X-all-your-base: are belong to us.
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

* E.B. Dreger <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net> [010417 18:36] wrote:
> 
> In this case, why not have a memory allocator similar to Hoard?

It doesn't work, but it's close:

http://people.freebsd.org/~alfred/memcache/

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
Represent yourself, show up at BABUG http://www.babug.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message