Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 02:40:29 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Cc: jobaldwi@vt.edu, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: revisiting Motif policy in ports Message-ID: <199904270940.CAA23892@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <199904230520.WAA64167@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> (message from Steve Kargl on Thu, 22 Apr 1999 22:20:44 -0700 (PDT)) References: <199904230520.WAA64167@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
* No. If you don't have HAVE_MOTIF in /etc/make.conf, then you get:
*
* cd /usr/ports/editors/nedit
* make install
* nedit-5.0.2 requires motif.
*
* I think the last line should at least be changed to advertise
* the availability of LessTif.
*
* cd /usr/ports/editors/nedit
* make install
* nedit-5.0.2 requires motif. LessTif is a LGPL implementation
* of the Motif API. A port is available in ports/x11-toolkits/lesstif.
* See /etc/make.conf.
I think this is a good idea. Is this wording OK for everyone? (I'll
substitute "${PORTSDIR}/" for the "ports/" part above.)
-PW
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904270940.CAA23892>