Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 09:37:16 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/databases Makefile ports/databases/db Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/databases/db/files patch-db.c Message-ID: <20040102223716.GK59441@k7.mavetju> In-Reply-To: <102705968.1073084484@pouet.in.mat.cc> References: <200401022153.i02LrfDh007063@repoman.freebsd.org> <102705968.1073084484@pouet.in.mat.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 11:01:24PM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +-Le 02/01/2004 13:53 -0800, Edwin Groothuis ?crivait : > | edwin 2004/01/02 13:53:41 PST > | > | FreeBSD ports repository > | > | Modified files: > | databases Makefile > | Added files: > | databases/db Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist > | databases/db/files patch-db.c > | Log: > | FreeBSD port of the NetBSD db(1) command. > | > | manipulate db(3)'s btree(3) and hash(3) databases > | > | Submitted by: edwin@mavetju.org > > Before Thu Aug 22 19:34:29 2002 UTC at which time it was removed, this had > version 2.7.7, now, it's 1.11, I don't know, but even if it's not the same > software at all, maybe it should require a PORTEPOCH bump ? As usual, what is wisdom? The previous was package was removed more than 15 months ago. It is not the same software, so an automatic update would not be the best thing what can happen to you. I think I leave it like this for the moment. Edwin, should have called it db-netbsd as he wanted first :-) -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040102223716.GK59441>