From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Mar 16 7:44:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5D737B718 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 07:44:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jgowdy@home.com) Received: from cx443070b ([24.0.36.170]) by femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20010316154157.ZNVM4364.femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com@cx443070b>; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 07:41:57 -0800 Message-ID: <004901c0ae30$62ab7180$aa240018@cx443070b> From: "Jeremiah Gowdy" To: "Mike Meyer" , "Adriaan Rossouw" Cc: , References: <15025.32921.535002.597631@guru.mired.org> Subject: Re: SAMBA Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 07:47:19 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Sharity-light is also in the ports tree, and runs in userland - it > apparently translates SMB calls to NFS. This has the advantage that > updating your system is less likely to break the port. Yeah, if only sharity light was reliable in the first place. I'll stick with the smbfs module. It hasn't failed me yet. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message