From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jul 19 21: 7:49 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mom.hooked.net (mom.hooked.net [206.80.6.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65EF14DC0; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 21:07:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) Received: from fish.hooked.net (garbanzo@fish.hooked.net [206.80.6.48]) by mom.hooked.net (8.8.6/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA14379; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 19:35:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 19:35:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex Zepeda To: "Brian F. Feldman" Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , Jamie Howard , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: m68k Support in FreeBSD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > Isn't it more a question of whether a proper cross-build system will > be available within the time frame that m68ks aren't completely obsolete? Bah! An 040 or 030 powered Mac w/ MacOS makes a decent web browsing, word processing machine; it's an actually useable alternative to an e-machine. Similarlly a 386 or 486 powered FreeBSD machine can still be quite useful even as a small server (admittedly the 68k Mac hardware makes for a piss poor server.. but still). I can't see a 486 or 040 powered machine becomming entirely obsolete until X is required to buildworld. - alex You better believe that marijuana can cause castration. Just suppose your girlfriend gets the munchies! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message