From owner-freebsd-current Mon Apr 19 10:27:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [209.249.129.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA68715577 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 1999 10:27:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA43892; Mon, 19 Apr 1999 10:22:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199904191722.KAA43892@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Nate Williams Cc: W Gerald Hicks , Alex Zepeda , "Daniel C. Sobral" , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , current , wghicks@wghicks.bellsouth.net Subject: Re: newbus and modem(s) In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 19 Apr 1999 11:11:52 MDT." <199904191711.LAA28594@mt.sri.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 10:22:48 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > All 'source code' control is guarded by a certain group of people in > *every* project, and FreeBSD is no different. It just has different > folks guarding it, who have different standards and requirements. Perhaps a good step towards understanding would be if those "guarding" the process would actually state what is their standard and requirements, if they have any. It coud start by something like this: FreeBSD Development Guidelines and Motivation... It don't matter nothing has bee resolved with this issue for the last year when I highlighted this problem and I doubt that anything will come out of it this time. Time To Hack! 8) -- Amancio Hasty hasty@star-gate.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message